Chia Yi Tsao vs Amanda Carreras Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W L
Form
L L W L L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Tsao 1 - 0 Carreras
They have played 1 sets in total, with Tsao winning 0 and Carreras winning 1. The last match between Tsao and Carreras was at the W25 Monastir, 25-01-2023, First, Hard with Chia Yi Tsao getting the victory 3-6 3-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chia Yi Tsao | 1 |
| Amanda Carreras | 0 |
W25 Monastir(25-01-2023)
3
6
3
3
| Tsao | Stats | Carreras |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 782 | Ranking | 892 |
| 464 | Highest Rank | 236 |
| 21 | Age | 34 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 11 |
| 57% (77-58) | Career Total W/L | 60% (449-296) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,106 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Lys PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 3-3 ret. |
Stats 
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Amanda Carreras
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
53%
(
25 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
47
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 6 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:29:0 | Average Match Time | 1:29:0 |
| 57% (27/47) | 1st Serve % | 66% (37/56) |
| 52% (14/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 45% (25/56) | Return Points Win % | 53% (25/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chia Yi Tsao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Remika Ohashi
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Yanni Liu
84%
(
77 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Momoko Kobori
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Junri Namigata
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Yuzuha Negishi
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Rinko Matsuda
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
91 of
120)
7
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
56 of
91)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
94 of
137)
13
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
62 of
94)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
57 of
137)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Carreras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Amanda Carreras
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carreras
Player
Freya Christie
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Amanda Carreras
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
53%
(
25 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
47
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefania Bojica
Player
Amanda Carreras
59%
(
79 of
133)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
47%
(
62 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carreras
Player
Chahd Berriri
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
42%
(
13 of
31)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
54
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Amanda Carreras
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
37 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (77/58) | Win/Loss | 60% (449/296) |
| 57% (175/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (991/669) |
| 54% (1579/1335) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (8190/6690) |
| 57% (56/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (67/54) |
| 56% (10/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (348/222) |
| 59% (10/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (30/15) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 245 | Aces Total | 60 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 379 | Total Double Faults | 451 |
| 1:29:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 419.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 543.42 |
| 63% (4703/7503) | 1st Serve % | 75% (12901/17180) |
| 64% (3012/4703) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (7245/12901) |
| 47% (1327/2800) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1907/4278) |
| 47% (431/914) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1254/2462) |
| 45% (3375/7526) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8548/17030) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (39/34) | Challenger W/L | 54% (191/161) |
| 63% (38/22) | Futures W/L | 66% (257/130) |
| 57% (75/132) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (442/730) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (16/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (54/115) |
| 43% (18/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (87/180) |
| 81% (85/69) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (459/411) |
| 19% (85/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (459/46) |
| 14% (50/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (286/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
